Well, it is out – the 2011-2012 Pine Richland High School Summer Reading List. It looks the same as the 2010-2011 list.
http://www.pinerichland.org/hs/Summer%20Reading%20Handout%202010-2011.pdf
"The House on Mango Street" for 9th grade: I do NOT want my 14 year old discussing - with a mixed sex pre-AP/honors English class and a teacher who may not share my values - a book that involves: a 13 year old having sex with multiple boys, the rape of the 13 year old main character, the widespread beatings of girls and women by their fathers or husbands, the generally anti-man/husband viewpoint, the negative view of a poor Hispanic community, and the shots taken at Catholicism - at least as I interpret the book. It is a feminist book. It also has girls behaving inappropriately toward older men and older men who also behave inappropriately toward the girls (e.g. old man gives 13 yr old a hard kiss on mouth). A friend thought her daughter didn't understand this, but it turns out she did and said she "thought it was gross".
"Alas, Babylon" (9th) is about the aftermath of nuclear war, also for 9th grade honors/pre-AP; apocalyptical, some consider this topic to be pro-environmental, anti-war indoctrination. Book itself seems ok.
THE AWAKENING by Kate Chopin (pre-AP 11).
I read "The Awakening" and can find no redeeming literature value in this book where the main character commits adultery, abandons her children, and finally commits suicide when her preferred lover who is not her husband leaves her, which is her final freedom from the oppressive 1900s society. She says she could never sacrifice her own desires for her children, and the author portrays this as ok. It's a feminist book, clearly known as a book about SEXUAL Awakening and freedom. Is also puts a POSITIVE spin on the main character's SUICIDE. My edition, 2003 Barnes & Noble Classics: The Awakening and Selected Short Fiction, mentions the lack of birth control for author Chopin when telling she had 6 children, notes Chopin had an affair with a married man after her husband died, and mentions how poor Margaret Sanger was imprisoned for a month for starting a birth control clinic (recall she is founder of Planned Parenthood and advocated eugenics of blacks thru abortion). It's not a good read, either.
THE BEAN TREES by Kingsolver, Barbara (12th)
Book includes the rape of a baby girl, very feminist, uses Christ's name in vain, uses profanity, single motherhood is the norm, pro-illegal immigration, pre-marital sex is a given-main character avoids getting pregnant not for morality but for freedom, see www.books.google.com to read parts for yourself, e.g. pg 36. Some examples:
Chap 1: "I knew what a p--ker looked like."
Bloody post-crime ER scene
"Why not, my daddy's been calling me a slut practically since I was thirteen, so why the h-ll not?"
"Sh--t" I said. "Sh-- fire son of a b-tch!"
When bathing the baby Native American girl someone gave the main character in a parking lot: "There was a bruise twice the size of my thumb on its inner arm....When I pulled off the pants and the diapers there were more bruises. Bruises and worse. The Indian child was a girl. A girl, poor thing. The fact had already burdened her short life with a kind of misery I could not imagine. I thought I knew about every ugly thing that one person does to another, but I had never even thought such things being done to a baby girl."
Chap 2: "[The amputated limb] had a smooth defenseless look to it that reminded her of a penis..."
"[Mexicans] were trying to take over the world like the Catholics."
Chap 8: Missy/Taylor and LuAnn speculate whether God has a "pee-pee" - most of the religious discussions are irreverent, signal familiarity with Christianity but no characters exhibit having real faith. LuAnn's family has anti-Catholic bias, and anti-Hispanic as well.
Chap 9: A character tries to kill herself. Describes terrible murder and kidnapping by folks opposing the teachers union in Guatemala. Taylor is tempted to sleep with married man but resists.
chap 12: baby gets raped/molested again
It's actually a good read, something you could read with your kids (or not!) because the many, many sensitive topics would get mangled by the wrong (i.e. secular humanist) group leader.
--following review excerpt is from "The Slate" on THE ROAD by Cormac McCarthy (honors 12th)
"We see it first I believe in an equally horrific scene in the first great work of the new nuclear genre: Cormac McCarthy's The Road. McCarthy's 2006 novel is not the airport type. It's an uncompromising achievement that transcends the nuke porn genre and yet, despite the horror at the heart of it, broke through to become an Oprah's Book Club selection—and of course, now, the soon-to-be-a-major-motion-picture version can be found featured in stacks at airport bookstores. The Road is the high-culture incarnation of the nuke porn nightmare, and more power to it.
In case you missed it, The Road takes place in an unspecified future several years into what seems like a final fatal nuclear winter that will extinguish the survivors of the human race, left stumbling through ash-choked roads looking for canned goods in gutted supermarkets to stave off starvation because nothing will ever grow again. (Or will it? I'll get to the mystery, or deliberate ambiguity of the ending later.) As far as I recall, the word nuclear is never used in the novel; there is just one memory, a quiet horror, of some dim flashes and thumps in the far-off night to indicate that this hellish wasteland is the product of nuclear war.
No causes or triggering incidents are discussed. No Islamic or Serbian villains. It is a charred On the Beach for our time with that film's romanticizing of doom stripped away. It focuses on a man and his son wearily pushing a shopping basket along a road south, hoping to escape the pursuing winter and the hungry rivals for the last remaining edibles.
One of the things they come upon—and you know it's coming and dread its coming; there's almost a kind of pornographic buildup to this unbearable money shot—is an act of cannibalism so horrific I refuse to describe it further. (I wonder if the movie will depict it.)
Take my word for it: You'll never be the same after reading this scene. I've been trying for two years to erase it from my memory without success. It may be the ultimate anti-nuke statement; the demonic version of the insipid "War is not healthy for children and other living things." (Once you read it you'll see the precise inversion of this slogan it represents.)"
I have actually read this book, the act above starts with the characters observing 3 men and a pregnant woman walking together. Later, they come across their abandoned camp and find the headless newborn's remains from being roasted and eaten. The book includes many gruesome scenes of burnt bodies, headless corpses, ongoing threat of cannibalism, suicide, violence, spirituality - the boy does not pray to God but to his deceased father. This book is considered a great work, an important work in advancing the radical environmental agenda, even though the source of the worldwide catastrophe is unidentified. The movie was R rated.
Ray Bradbury's "Fahrenheit 451" is considered somewhat controversial, another apocalypse theme.
And finally, "Brave New World" is for all 12th graders and is written by Aldous Huxley, whose brother helped start the UN. This book involves mass promiscuity. It seems to be a staple of HS reading lists. It's not clear to me if it's a warning or a promotion of the idea that humanity will be so distracted that when changes come to the system they will be accepted or ignored (sounds like the public school system).
And here is what the Academic Achievement Committee's response was to a revised list by the HS English Dept: from January 24, 2011 meeting: http://www.boarddocs.com/pa/prsd/Board.nsf/files/8EG2XJ04513A/$file/Minutes%20Academic%20Ach%20Com%201%2024%2011.pdf
Summer Reading Change
The English Department proposed changes to the summer reading list for 2011.
Committee Recommendation
The committee questioned the rationale for the proposed change and recommended that the reading list remain the same.
The following persons were present; Board Members: Banyas, Dawson (chairman), Herko, Nigh, and Sundo; Administrators: Bucci,
Foley, Davis, Davis, Welter, Delp and Pietrusinski.
With the retirement of Ms. Boice, I am not sure how we will get such informative and complete details of the Board meetings…
What does this have to do with you? Your child isn't even in the high school. Complain about your own school's reading list and leave ours alone.
ReplyDeletePrevious commenter - are you not able to see the bigger picture? Thank goodness that crosbycat is spending her time doing this for the community so that we can all be informed.
ReplyDeleteCrosby - have you had any of these issues at the lower grade levels? I am telling you - the English and Social Studies teachers at the HS are really pushing an agenda....
Spend your own time, do your own research, read these books yourself and make your own decisions. Don't blindly follow a person who gives anonymous opinions and who has an obvious conservative, religious agenda and an unhealthy obsession with an entire school district just because it doesn't conform to her narrow worldview.
ReplyDeleteActually - I have spent my own time researching MANY aspects of the PRSD (symposium, textbooks, Stem, budgets, and other various programs at the schools), and my findings have been exactly in line with Crosbycat's. So on the summer reading list - I am going to trust her research - and will do a little poking around myself. You obviously have a secularist worldview, and an unhealthy elitist attitude that assumes that anyone who actually DOES research and forms an opinion other then what is spoonfed to you (an educator I presume), is a religious right wing nut.
ReplyDeleteI'm definitely not an elitist, but I do have a global worldview. I want my children to have a liberal, secular education, which is the purpose of the public school system. If I didn't, I would send them to religious schools.
ReplyDeleteThat is ridiculous. How could you possibly think that the purpose of the public school system is to give children a liberal, secular humanist education? Wouldn't that be unfair to the majority of taxpayers paying for the schools?
ReplyDeleteThe majority of taxpayers do want that, that's why it's that way. Send your child to religious school if you object.
ReplyDeleteTo the people who don't like that their tax money is going to Pine-Richland (which is a perfectly good school, I might add), you can move.
ReplyDelete"With the retirement of Ms. Boice, I am not sure how we will get such informative and complete details of the Board meetings…"
ReplyDeleteHow about going to BoardDocs? These details aren't available just because of Ms. Boice, they're available to everyone at anytime and always will be. You randomly assign blame/credit where neither is due.
They seem to change the reading list every year though. I've read Brave New World and a few of these, and although some of them are disturbing/sexual, I wouldn't say that any of them are much more explicit than most of the media today. That's not to say I support all the sex/violence on TV, but sometimes reading about terrible values can support and emphasize the good values you should follow?
ReplyDeleteFirst off...Crosby, may I point out the fact that you are not in the Pine-Richland District. You yourself are not a student here, nor are your children, so concerning yourself with this district is a pointless waste of time. Continuing on, may I point out a flaw in your argument in which you begin to bash each summer reading book, you contradict yourself on numerous occasions. So rather than making an intelligent argument, you make a rather idiotic one... As a student at Pine-Richland High School, I have read these summer reading books you include in this mediocre blog of of yours, and yes....for once Sherlock..you're correct on something. There are some raunchy and apocalyptical themes included in the plots, however, there is a bigger meaning to these books than what you are claiming. This may be a perfect example to prove how how narrow-minded you are, and how you are unable to comprehend the truth is any situation. As for your "followers" that say they agree with you..they are just as narrow-minded as you and they lack the ability to think for themselves. How dare you insult my teachers and district. You have no right. Just because you are insecure with your own weak, "Christian" life. I would just like to say...Congrats..you have achieved what you wanted to with this blog, you have successfully made yourself look like an idiot. You have also managed to embarrass your children and your enuresis family. I wonder how your teenage daughter feels about this? I know how I would feel...disappointed.
ReplyDeleteSo what exactly is your obsession with our school? Your kids do not even go here and yet you consistently criticize a perfectly fine high school! Also let me get another thing straight, this is a PUBLIC school. Not everyone here is christian, nor do we share your narrow minded, ignorant beliefs. Anyone here can see that you are clearly doing this for your own purposes, and anyone who makes a crappy blog to try and convince everyone that you are a concerned 'intellectual' clearly has some personal problems.
ReplyDeleteThis is a great point!
DeleteThe Awakening actually does not end on a positive note, but a reflective one, telling that, even though she had everything that she 'wanted', she was still unhappy not being accepted by society. It's a moral; you can't totally break the mold.
ReplyDeleteAnd with the reference referring to the Catholics taking over the world, the book was referring to Alexander the Great, who did attempt to take over the known world.
Please, learn some insight before you post biased and distorted facts.