Friday, April 29, 2011

Things I Learned from my Pine-Richland Student:

We have found that in some significant areas, the teaching at Pine-Richland is systematically tearing apart the values and morals we parents are giving to our children, and this teaching is intended to re-shape their worldviews into Socialists-Marxists.

Teaching is slanted to undermining the belief that the United States is good and special and unique in its founding and its system of government, that there is a good reason so many immigrants have been coming here since our founding, through today in spite of our flaws.

Parents need to remember that their kids don't have a knowledge base to be able to tell facts from errors, and that the kids do not tell them much! Some examples:

  • William Shakespeare was a homosexual.
  • Benjamin Franklin had over 80 illegitimate children.
  • In Christianity Easter replaced Passover and Christian missionaries "converted Gentiles and forced them to follow Jewish law".
  • During World War II, it was an atrocity that the Americans destroyed the beautiful architecture in Germany.
  • Early colonists tried to make Native Americans slaves, but they were too weak to work.
  • Colonists gave the Native Americans blankets that were infected with small pox on purpose, killing – that is, genocide! (theory originates with the controversial Ward Churchill who has expressed hatred toward America and believes the 9-11 attacks on the World Trade Center were justified).
  • The colonists fighting in the Revolutionary War were radical terrorists (not an exaggeration - this was from my own kid).
  • John Hancock tarred and feathered British postal workers and the colonists in general were murderous, burning down houses etc (teacher may have gotten this in error from the John Adams HBO miniseries).
  • George Washington was a terrible failure as a soldier.
  • The French and Indian War was all the colonists' fault.  The British had to impose high taxes because they bailed us out.  Therefore, we should have just paid the taxes, the Revolutionary War was unethical, and thus the United States should not even exist.
  • The Afghanistan war is like the Revolutionary War, only the Taliban are like the colonists and the US soldiers are like the British.
  • the colonists at Jamestown became cannibals and so did Roanoke (only evidence is possibly one mentally ill man at Jamestown; only one oddball "historian" thinks Roanoke did this).
  • Islam is more democratic and spiritual than Christianity (teacher notes).
  • Islam teachings stress love, kindness, brotherhood (teacher notes).
  • The Koran might be viewed as a sequel to the Bible (teacher notes).
  • On Christianity: "Historians believe that the gospel of Mark was the most authentic and was used by other authors later.  However, the testimony was written by "believers" not the apostles (not fact) and even they disagree".  This is from a PR HS teacher's class notes!!!!

For Current Global Issues HS course, questions included: "What motivates religious people to turn to violence? Do religious beliefs justify terror?  Why can't we all get along (if religions are basically the same)?  Would the world be better without religion?"  (This course also uses the UN Cyber School Bus curriculum).

  • The HS started having a spring Symposium on Education: in 2010 it was on "Ethics in Education" but it could just as easily be called "A Tribute to Brazilian Marxist Education Reformer Paulo Freire"; and in 2009 it was on "Democracy in Education" but could be  re-named "An Ode to Progressive Leader John Dewey".  These events were the pinnacle of Marxist, Progressive, secular humanistic indoctrination; It can be found in reading 30+ essays that they all projected anti-Christian, un-American, anti-capitalistic, pro-abortion, liberal views.
  • Our children are being taught to get into Socratic Circles and dialogue (not debate) until they reach a consensus (compromise). There are certain values and principles that we teach our children in which there is not room for compromise. Such categories are faith, morals and values.
  • Our children are also being taught that they are being brought up with biases, biases that they get from their parents, pastors, etc. and that they should question everyone and everything.
Regardless of what anyone is saying Pine Richland is about as far from a conservative district that you could find. Actions speak louder than words and the majority of teachers, the curriculum, and the district would be considered, on the facts alone, very progressive.


 

15 comments:

  1. Thanks for staying on top of this and posting it. My kids aren't in the system yet and I am sending my daughter to Catholic school (will be in first grade next year). Do you happen to know if it is a trend coming from certain teachers? I am questioning this in light of the syposium and wondering if there is a push from certain factions there. We need to get more people on the school board who are going to pay attention to this stuff. Not sure about the new appointment. If it keeps heading this way - we will move to Mars, pay half the taxes, and keep our kids in Catholic SChool all the way through high school. Please keep doing what you are doing. We must get parents together in an organized group - like you mentioned before - to combat this.. actively! It doesn't take much to stop it, I have learned.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh my gosh - I just finished reading this. I am so disgusted - with ALL of it!!! This sounds like Social Studies course teachings.. is this true? Are the ones that aren't noted as teacher notes from textbooks or comments that your kids made about what they learned? what grades? If HS - I am guessing it is from Dolphin (English) and Poulakos -who also planned the syposium..am I wrong? Have you shared this with anyone else? Please please don't keep this quiet. I will help you if you want help in getting the message out there!! Is it

    ReplyDelete
  3. You should post this to other blogs that are read in the area...have got to start getting the word out.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Kind Anonymous (as opposed to Angry hateful liberal Anonymous and Boring long-winded Anonymous)! Sorry so long to reply. Yes some parents, most teachers, all of the school board directors, and Superintendent Bucci all know about this. Until this ends up on the Glenn Beck program, parents will ignore their doubts and concerns with what they see their kids learning. So vote against Nigh, Dawson and Misback and tell your friends. Crosbycat comments in as many places as possible and we would love any help getting the truth out and getting others involved!

    ReplyDelete
  5. You're right! Glenn Beck should talk about this, maybe in December? Oh. Wait...

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/07/business/media/07beck.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. If you have enough time to author all of these blogs, and comment on nearly all of the media outlets of local school districts (i.e. the Patch), why don't you run for school board? I bet that would end well.

    ReplyDelete
  7. First off, I would like to thank you.
    Under this government, its hard to do this.
    Considering your writing, you must be smart.
    Killing our children's free speech is horrible.
    You have a lot of great points here.
    Our schools need some sort of reform.
    Ultraradicals are killing the country.

    ReplyDelete
  8. As much as I want to even consider your views, they are flawed beyond belief. I am a student @ PR, and I was a participant in that 2010 Symposium which you have chosen to disparage. The Symposium was a very open forum where students were able to share their views as they please, and many students did disagree with the prerequisite writings. There were numerous opposing viewpoints, and students were not forced to come to any "consensus." It's the same way in a Socratic Seminar (which I have also participated in countless times). We share our thoughts and our ideas, and we are allowed to disagree with each other, and no consensus is reached, but it is instead a sharing of ideas. Before you go off on the district for teaching "Socialist Marxist" values, maybe you should learn more about what it is really about. There is a Symposium every spring, and the public is welcome to attend for free. Stop by in 2012 and understand how PR is allowing students to learn and feel safe sharing their thoughts and ideas. Remember if you go that these students are learning how to be thoughtful members of society who can judge situations for themselves. Or, you can stand outside the Symposium and picket it because, frankly, I don't care.

    ReplyDelete
  9. As a student at PRHS, I see how you have constructed your points and agree with a few - but most are taken radically out of context. You have written that all of these were taught as irrevocable fact. In reality, they were almost all taught as possibilities or theories. I've gone through all of these courses, and Shakespeare's sexuality, the Native American smallpox/slave debate, Jamestown/Roanoke cannibalism, etc - In my experience, all of this and more has been presented as a theory. I suspect that you grossly exaggerated a few of these points, such as the 80 wedlock children of Ben Franklin.

    You clearly didn't ask your child for an explanation behind these, or you didn't post it. For example, the colonists were radical terrorists in the sense that they used new and never-before-seen guerrilla warfare, such as sniping from behind trees and hiding. The norm was to be lined up in rows in the open and shoot to the death- no sneaking around.

    Dialogue vs. Debate - Although the rhetoric makes it seem like we are talking until we reach a "compromise", in reality students present different ideas about the assigned text. They are often formulated to be unrealistic/radical because it stirs up an otherwise boring discussion. The idea is not to reach a compromise as you say, but to reach a consensus so that you all agree as to what the writer meant. The key here is that you argue what the writer meant, not what you mean. It is the parents' jobs to educated their children on their morals in reality and unbounded possibility.

    "There are certain values and principles that we teach our children in which there is not room for compromise. Such categories are faith, morals and values." Yes, this is absolutely true and is a responsibility of the parents. However, students do not debate on their morals, but on what the writer intended, and how the author's ideas would work in different circumstances. Once again, this is a matter of a "fairytale" world, seeing how the ideas do/don't work.

    "Our children are also being taught that they are being brought up with biases, biases that they get from their parents, pastors, etc." So, you're saying that we don't learn different opinions and viewpoints from these people? Your parents teach you things, and you pick up on things. For example, you may start judging people who use drugs or have premartial sex because your parents and pastors told you it was wrong. Therefore, you are biased against these because of how you were brought up. Ask your kid for an explanation next time. I'm guessing from the material that your children were in 7th and 9th when you wrote this? They are plenty capable of explaining what they've learned.

    Please come in. Sit in the back of the classrooms and through some of the Symposium presentations. You will see that the lessons are much more innocent than you have made them out to be.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It seems to me that you are giving the word "liberal" a negative connotation. While I believe in conservative political beliefs, it is important to know both viewpoints, and understand why those who you disagree with think the way they do. Just because an idea is "liberal" does not make it bad, even to a conservative.
    As for the idea of biases, you are obviously biased against liberals. In the classes that you are talking about, the ideas that you believe in would be reinforced, and you would have the opportunity to learn the opposing viewpoint.
    I am not trying to be "hateful" or "boring," but you need to understand what your posts are doing. They are depriving students of the ability to see both sides of the world. In the real world not everyone will agree with you or your kids. While you might not like some of these theories, it is important that they are taught.
    Mrs. Poulakos does not in any way tell us what to believe, or what is right or wrong. The discussion of religion is kept to the relevance of the class. Neither the Jewish kids, nor the strict Christians are offended (one girl in my class is the daughter of a reverend and has no problem with anything said in the class).

    ReplyDelete
  11. The biases of teachers? Don't be a hypocrite. Evaluate the bias in your own stupid blog before trolling about the bias of people who have their own parents who are just as concerned with their child's well being. The difference is they aren't idiots about it. I myself am a conservative Christian too; that does not mean we have to freak out about anything that we do not agree with.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It seems to me that you continue making the words "liberal" and "progressive" negative ones...while you're trying to make the school conservative. One could just as easily make equally negative remarks about conservatism, which you believe to be the solution to all of this. Maybe if your arguments weren't so radical, more people would listen, but I keep hearing about some crazy woman trying to end Symposium. What's more, this woman doesn't even have a student at Pine-Richland, so why is it her business? I have a great answer for that. It's not.
    Also, your comments about Mr. Dolphin and Mrs. Poulakos are wildly inaccurate, as they are well-known as two of the best teachers at Pine-Richland.
    - A Real-World Student

    ReplyDelete
  13. As a student...

    You don't know what your talking about...
    You are hysterical
    Stop making things up, stretching the truth and bashing great teachers

    ReplyDelete
  14. I love how you can feel that it is right to get so angry about any teachings that put a negative light on christianity, while you get so angry about other religions being protrayed even some what positive. The teachers aren't taking over all sides or trying to change anyone's beliefs. they are teaching history, and in history christianity has often been wrong and unethical like any other religion. for you to discriminate like that is so incredibly prejuidice and rude. you really need to think before you type some of the stuff you do because it is really offensive to others of different religions. Also, there is absolutely nothing wrong with being a liberal, I am one and I'm proud.

    ReplyDelete